Universities are using casual contracts to put profit before people

The Guardian | 17 November 2016 | by Kehinde Andrews
Friday 10 February 2017
by  antonin

There is a place for casualised work in academia but it is becoming so widespread that talent is being driven away, and both staff and students suffer

In 2009-10, during the final year of my PhD at the University of Birmingham, a decision was made on high to close one of the flagship departments of British sociology. The rationale was that they could offer a degree in the subject without the expense of a large team of highly trained specialists. As one of the managers put it at the time “we are all social scientists”. So why invest in a department of sociology when the degree could be taught by a range of other staff?

We organised a campaign to attempt to save our department, complete with petitions, protests and placards. But we were fighting against an irrepressible force of marketisation that in hindsight we had no prospect of preventing. Eventually the decision was made to close the department, relocate the degree to the politics faculty and retain only five staff from a subject that once employed 18 people, including losing the two professors.

It is no coincidence, then, that Birmingham has been highlighted in the Guardian’s investigation into the casualisation of the higher education workforce, as the Russell Group institution with the highest amount of staff – 70% – on insecure contracts, which is part of a wider trend of market forces transforming the sector. With students paying such high fees for their education, we really need to question where this money is going.

Looking back at our campaign, one of the most important (and catchy) slogans was that we wanted support for “students, not Starbucks”. At the same time the university was slashing the teaching staff, it was investing in a multimillion-pound building project with the coffee chain as its centrepiece. As this week’s reporting reveals, Birmingham is currently undergoing £500m of building refurbishments.

It is clear that the problem of the casualisation of the workforce is not caused by a lack of money in universities but rather what is prioritised when they become a marketplace. Institutions across the country are spending millions investing in buildings, facilities and eye-wateringly expensive halls of residence. The ever-increasing pay of vice-chancellors is also testament to the money that is actually available.

But as much as we academics may complain about this spending, it is a model that makes good business sense. Potential customers (students) are attracted to the facilities that are available on campuses, which are relentlessly sold on open days. A major coffee chain has now become as essential a feature to a university as a library. Although such cafes presumably pay for themselves, our argument was about the symbol of marketisation they represent.

My own university, Birmingham City, recently moved from a deprived inner-city neighbourhood into a modern new building in the city centre. Most of my students have said that, regardless of the quality of the education, they would not have applied had we remained in the old building and location. The management at the University of Birmingham was also right about sociology; having a skeleton staff and no professors did not dent recruitment on to the degree.

And casual contracts in fact play a vital role in universities. My first job was as an hourly paid graduate teaching assistant running student seminars. This was invaluable experience, without which I am certain that I would not have my current job. The PhD students who are teaching a number of my seminar classes, on temporary part-time contracts or paid hourly, allow me to spend time doing the research that is fed back into my teaching. Short-term contracts are also necessary when academics win research grants and need time to dedicate to their projects.

This does not, however, explain the extraordinary levels of casualisation that we are seeing. I was lucky in that I only had to work at four different insecure jobs at the same time for six months – including doing data entry at a solicitor’s firm – before I landed the holy grail of a permanent full-time contract. One of my colleagues has spent the past seven years on temporary contracts at the same university, despite having launched and coordinated a masters programme. This precarity threatens to undermine the value of university education and deters people from entering the profession in the first place.

I know of a number of people who have abandoned academia completely. It turns out that having to supplement your pitiful income working in a call centre or as a cleaner is not the pay-off that my colleagues were expecting after years of investing in their education.

by Kehinde Andrews Part of the reason that redbrick universities tend to have a more casualised workforce is because of the increasing split between research and teaching. The mechanisms for evaluating research incentivise universities with the resources to invest in leading research staff, who spend very little time in the classroom. So a university may have the leading scholars in a field but students will be taught by junior staff, quite often on precarious contracts, who do not have the time or security to develop their research careers.

At the other end of this spectrum is the focus of some universities on being “teaching focused”. I have a colleague who was stuck bouncing between temporary part-time contracts for five years at redbrick universities, while being rejected for jobs at newer universities because he was deemed to be too “research focused” for the students. The lack of jobs in the sector in general means that there is always someone ready to snap up the crumbs of insecure positions when they become available.

Ultimately, the casualisation of the academic workforce undermines the quality of the education that is provided, short-changing not only the staff, who suffer the consequences of low-paid, insecure work, but also the students.


Read on The Guardian

Photo credit: Students graduating at the University of Birmingham. ‘With students paying such high fees for their education, we really need to question where this money is going.’ Photograph: Christopher Furlong/Getty Images



commentaires article

Agenda

<<

2017

 

<<

Février

 

Aujourd'hui

LuMaMeJeVeSaDi
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272812345
Aucun évènement à venir les 2 prochains mois

News items

C. Villani : "on arrive à se sentir étouffé"

dimanche 5 février

[Interview de C. Villani, The Conversation, 30/01/2017]
Revenons en France avec une question beaucoup plus terre à terre : un jeune docteur en mathématique qui vient d’enchaîner un ou deux postdoc à l’étranger décroche un poste de chargé de recherche ou de maître de conférence. Il débute alors sa carrière avec un salaire de 1 800 euros net par mois. Comment qualifier cette situation et comment l’améliorer pour créer des vocations ?

C.V. : Malgré ce salaire peu reluisant, le statut du CNRS reste attractif pour sa grande liberté. Si l’on veut garder son attrait à la profession, il est important de travailler sur le reste : en premier lieu, limiter les règles, les contraintes, les rapports. Je donnerai un exemple parmi quantité : le CNRS vient de décider qu’il refuse tout remboursement des missions effectuées dans un contexte d’économie partagée : pas de remboursement de logement Airbnb, ni de trajet BlaBlaCar… De petites contraintes en petites contraintes, on arrive à se sentir étouffé. Le simple sentiment d’être respecté et de ne pas avoir à lutter pour son budget, par ailleurs, pourra jouer beaucoup. Par ailleurs, il est certain qu’une revalorisation salariale ou d’autres avantages pour les débuts de carrière seront bienvenus.

Les universités vont continuer à geler des postes en 2017

lundi 28 novembre 2016

La crise budgétaire des universités françaises continue depuis leur passage à l’ "autonomie" avec comme conséquence directe l’utilisation de la masse comme variable d’ajustement. Comment diminuer la masse salarial ? Embaucher des contractuels au lieu de titulaires, demander et ne pas payer des heures supplémentaires aux enseignants-chercheurs titulaires, supprimer des postes d’ATER et des contrats doctoraux ou encore geler des postes. Mais que signifie "geler des postes" ? Il s’agit de ne pas ouvrir à candidature des postes de titulaires ouverts par le ministères. Depuis 2009, 11.000 postes ont été gelés dans les universités dont 1200 les cinq dernières années. En 2017, ce processus continuera dans de nombreuses universités : Paris 1, Toulouse Paul Sabatier, Reims, Paris-Est Créteil, Dijon, Orléans, Brest, Paris 8, Bordeaux 3, Artois, Bretagne-Sud, Lyon 3, Limoges, Pau, Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée.

New Analysis of Employment Outcomes for Ph.D.s in Canada

Thursday 5 February 2015

An analysis of where Canada’s Ph.D.-holders are employed finds that just 18.6 percent are employed as full-time university professors. The analysis from the Conference Board of Canada finds that nearly 40 percent of Ph.D.s are employed in higher education in some capacity, but many are in temporary or transitional positions. The other three-fifths are employed in diverse careers in industry, government and non-governmental organizations: “Indeed, employment in diverse, non-academic careers is the norm, not the exception, for Ph.D.s in Canada.” - Inside Higher Edu, January 8, 2015

[Sweden] New legislation to help foreign postgraduates stay on

Sunday 27 April 2014

On 1 July this year, new legislation will come into force in Sweden that includes measures which will make it considerably easier for foreign doctoral candidates and students to stay and work in the country after graduating.

An agreement between the outgoing Alliance government and the Swedish Green party will secure a majority vote for the proposal in the parliament. (...) – University World News, by Jan Petter Myklebust, 21 March 2014 Issue No:312

On the Web : Full news here

US : Dwindling tenure posts

vendredi 18 avril 2014

Tenure is dying out at US universities.

The proportion of non-tenure-track and non-tenured faculty posts continues to rise across all US institutions, finds a report by the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) in Washington DC. Losing Focus : The Annual Report on the Economic Status of the Profession, 201314 surveyed 1,159 public and private US institutions and found that the overall proportion of assistant professors in non-tenure-track posts was 23.4 for 201314, compared with 20.8 in 201011. Dwindling tenured and tenure-track posts threaten the ability of scientists to conduct research without interference from funders or administrators, says John Curtis, the report’s lead author and director of research and public policy for the AAUP. - Nature, 508, 277, 09 April 2014

Sur le Web : Read on nature.com
Soutenir par un don